{"id":5477482,"date":"2013-08-28T07:39:37","date_gmt":"2013-08-28T05:39:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/criticalbiomass.blog.hu\/2013\/08\/28\/a_gmo_gyapot_haszna"},"modified":"2013-08-28T07:39:37","modified_gmt":"2013-08-28T05:39:37","slug":"a_gmo_gyapot_haszna","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/criticalbiomass.hu\/?p=5477482","title":{"rendered":"A GMO gyapot haszna 2."},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm;\">Tal\u00e1lni -e adatokat arra, hogy mi az eddig felhaszn\u00e1lt GM term\u00e9nyek hat\u00e1sa a mez\u0151gazdas\u00e1gra? Nem meglep\u0151 m\u00f3don sokan foglalkoztak ezzel a k\u00e9rd\u00e9ssel, ma egy ilyen cikket venn\u00e9k el\u0151.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm;\">\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/m.cdn.blog.hu\/cr\/criticalbiomass\/image\/post_img\/2013\/08\/GMO01_01.jpg\" alt=\"GMO01_01.jpg\" class=\"imgnotext\" height=\"221\" width=\"537\" \/>Val\u00f3sz\u00edn\u0171leg GM-gyapotot vetnek a legt\u00f6bb orsz\u00e1gban a F\u00f6ld\u00f6n, 2009 -ben tizenhat milli\u00f3 hekt\u00e1ron vetettek k\u00fcl\u00f6nb\u00f6z\u0151 GM fajt\u00e1kat, \u00e1ltal\u00e1ban a rovaroknak ellen\u00e1ll\u00f3, valamilyen Bt toxint termel\u0151 fajt\u00e1kat. Ez a ter\u00fclet a vil\u00e1g \u00f6sszes gyapotterm\u0151ter\u00fclet\u00e9nek 45% -a, \u00fagyhogy elmondhatjuk, hogy statisztikailag megfelel\u0151 m\u00e9ret\u0171 mint\u00e1val dolgozhatunk. A legt\u00f6bb termel\u0151 a Monsanto Bollgard I vagy Bollgard II technol\u00f3gi\u00e1it hordoz\u00f3 fajt\u00e1it vetette. Az els\u0151 t\u00e1bl\u00e1zat indiai gazdas\u00e1gok eredm\u00e9ny\u00e9t mutatja h\u00e1rom k\u00fcl\u00f6nb\u00f6z\u0151 \u00e9vben. Az \u00e1tlagos gazdas\u00e1g m\u00e9rete \u00f6t hekt\u00e1r alatt maradt, \u00fagyhogy d\u00f6nt\u0151en kistermel\u0151ket vizsg\u00e1ltak meg. A GM-gyapotot termel\u0151 gazdas\u00e1gokban cs\u00f6kkent a permetez\u00e9sek sz\u00e1ma, cs\u00f6kkent a felhaszn\u00e1lt rovarirt\u00f3szerek mennyis\u00e9ge, \u00e9s mindemellett n\u0151tt a term\u00e9shozam, \u00edgy a haszon is. Gy\u00f6ny\u00f6r\u0171en l\u00e1tszik, hogy igaz ugyan, hogy a GM-vet\u0151mag dr\u00e1g\u00e1bb a nem-GM -n\u00e9l, de azonnal behozza az \u00e1r\u00e1t a kevesebb rovarirt\u00f3kon, \u00edgy a gazda haszna m\u00e9g mindig t\u00f6bb, mint a hagyom\u00e1nyos vet\u0151maggal. Meglep\u0151 m\u00f3don, mivel 2006 -ra a gazd\u00e1k nagy r\u00e9sze m\u00e1r GM-gyapotot vetett, a k\u00e1rtev\u0151k is megritkultak, \u00fagyhogy a hagyom\u00e1nyos gyapotot termel\u0151 gazd\u00e1knak is kevesebbet kellett permetezni\u00fck. \u00d6sszesen a h\u00e1rom vizsg\u00e1lt \u00e9vben 40% -kal kevesebb rovarirt\u00f3t haszn\u00e1ltak fel a gazd\u00e1k. A term\u00e9shozam 30-40% -kal n\u0151tt a GM-gyapotot vet\u0151 gazd\u00e1k telkein. Hasonl\u00f3 eredm\u00e9nyek figyelhet\u0151ek meg m\u00e1s orsz\u00e1gokban is, ezt mutatja a m\u00e1sodik t\u00e1bl\u00e1zat. Nagyon \u00fagy t\u0171nik, hogy mivel nem eszk\u00f6z- \u00e9s anyagig\u00e9nyes, a GM-gyapotb\u00f3l \u00e9ppen \u00fagy hasznot h\u00faz a kisparaszt is, mint a nagybirtok.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/m.cdn.blog.hu\/cr\/criticalbiomass\/image\/post_img\/2013\/08\/GMO01_02.jpg\" alt=\"GMO01_02.jpg\" class=\"imgnotext\" height=\"242\" width=\"405\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm;\">Qaim, M. (2010). Benefits of genetically modified crops for the poor: household income, nutrition, and health. <i>New biotechnology<\/i>, <i>27<\/i>(5), 552-557.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tal\u00e1lni -e adatokat arra, hogy mi az eddig felhaszn\u00e1lt GM term\u00e9nyek hat\u00e1sa a mez\u0151gazdas\u00e1gra? Nem meglep\u0151 m\u00f3don sokan foglalkoztak ezzel a k\u00e9rd\u00e9ssel, ma egy ilyen cikket venn\u00e9k el\u0151.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,4,1],"tags":[35,6],"class_list":["post-5477482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-elet_es_tudomany","category-gmo_vita","category-uncategorized","tag-bt_toxin","tag-gensebeszet"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/criticalbiomass.hu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5477482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/criticalbiomass.hu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/criticalbiomass.hu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/criticalbiomass.hu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/criticalbiomass.hu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5477482"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/criticalbiomass.hu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5477482\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/criticalbiomass.hu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5477482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/criticalbiomass.hu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5477482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/criticalbiomass.hu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5477482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}